1
0
mirror of https://github.com/tornadocash/docs synced 2024-02-02 15:04:08 +01:00
docs/general/how-does-tornado.cash-work.md

43 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# How Does Tornado Cash Work?
Before diving into the tutorials explaining & easing the use of Tornado.Cash, here is an overall overview of the protocol's global functioning.
### Global overview of Tornado.Cash functioning
To achieve privacy, Tornado.Cash **uses smart contracts that accept token deposits from one address and enable their withdrawal from a different address**. Those smart contracts work as pools that mix all deposited assets.
Once the funds are withdrawn by a complete new address from those pools, the on-chain link between the source & the destination is broken. The withdrawn crypto-assets are therefore anonymized.
While tokens are in a Tornado Cash pool, the custody remains in users hands. Users, therefore, have complete control over their tokens.
**For traditional Tornado Cash fixed-amount pools**:
* When a user puts funds into a pool (a.k.a. the deposit), a private note is generated. This private note works as a private key for the user to access those funds later. To withdraw them, the same user can use a different address - an old or a new one - and recover his/her funds thanks to this private key.
**For Tornado Cash Nova, the new ETH pool with arbitrary amounts & shielded transfers**:
* Funds are directly linked to a given wallet address. There is no private note or key. Users can access their funds by connecting to the pool with the appropriate address.
* Custody is either acquired by the act of depositing tokens into the pool or by registering in the pool & receiving shielded transfers from another address.
The strength of such protocol is linked directly to its number of users and the size of its pool. The more users deposit into the pool the merrier. However, to preserve privacy & anonymity, the user must keep in mind some basic rules, such as:
* Using a relayer to pay gas at withdrawal;
* Allowing time to lapse between the deposit & the withdrawal action;
* Mixing its funds with the crowd by waiting for several transactions before recovering its assets.
_More recommendations are provided in:_ [_Tips to remain anonymous_](tips-to-remain-anonymous.md)_._
### Contribution of zk-SNARK & hashing process
Tornado.Cash uses Zero-Knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge (also called zk-SNARK) to verify & allow transactions.
To process a deposit, Tornado.Cash generates a random area of bytes, computes it through the [Pedersen Hash](https://iden3-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/iden3\_repos/research/publications/zkproof-standards-workshop-2/pedersen-hash/pedersen.html) (as it is friendlier with zk-SNARKs), then sends the token & the 20 MiMC hash to the smart contract. The contract will then insert it into the Merkle tree.
To process a withdrawal, the same area of bytes is split into two separate parts: the **secret** on one side & the **nullifier** on the other side. The nullifier is hashed. This nullifier is a public input that is sent on-chain to be checked with the smart contract & the Merkle tree data. It avoids double-spending for instance.
Thanks to zk-SNARK, it is possible to prove the 20 MiMC hash of the initial commitment and of the nullifier without revealing any information. Even if the nullifier is public, privacy is sustained as there is no way to link the hashed nullifier to the initial commitment. Besides, even if the information about the transaction is present in the Merkle root, the information about the exact Merkle path, and subsequently the location of the transaction, is still kept private.
Deposits are simple from a technical point of view, but expensive in terms of gas as they need to compute the 20 MiMC hash & update the Merkle tree. On the other hand, the withdrawal process is complex but cheaper as gas is only needed for the nullifier hash and the zero-knowledge proof.
_Written & updated by_ [_@ayefda_](https://torn.community/u/ayefda)