oceanprotocol/docs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/oceanprotocol/docs.git synced 2024-11-26 19:49:26 +01:00
Code Releases Activity

GITBOOK-420: Removed access control tools page

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Ana Loznianu 2023-06-06 12:04:02 +00:00 committed by gitbook-bot
parent 800168a270
commit 9922c63d85
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 07D2180C7B12D0FF
4 changed files with 2 additions and 20 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

1
SUMMARY.md
View File

@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
* [Community monetization](developers/contracts/community-monetization.md)
* [Datatoken Templates](developers/contracts/datatoken-templates.md)
* [Metadata](developers/contracts/metadata.md)
* [Access Control Tools](developers/contracts/access-control-tools.md)
* [Revenue](developers/contracts/revenue.md)
* [Roles](developers/contracts/roles.md)
* [Fees](developers/fees.md)

2
developers/compute-to-data/compute-to-data-architecture.md
View File

@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Before the flow can begin, these pre-conditions must be met:
### Access Control using Ocean Provider
As with [the `access` service](../contracts/access-control-tools.md), the `compute` service requires the **Ocean Provider** as a component handled by Publishers. Ocean Provider is in charge of interacting with users and managing the basics of a Publisher's infrastructure to integrate this infrastructure into Ocean Protocol. The direct interaction with the infrastructure where the data resides happens through this component only.
As with [the `access` service](broken-reference), the `compute` service requires the **Ocean Provider** as a component handled by Publishers. Ocean Provider is in charge of interacting with users and managing the basics of a Publisher's infrastructure to integrate this infrastructure into Ocean Protocol. The direct interaction with the infrastructure where the data resides happens through this component only.
Ocean Provider includes the credentials to interact with the infrastructure (initially in cloud providers, but it could be on-premise).

17
developers/contracts/access-control-tools.md
View File

@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
# Access Control Tools
Data NFTs are based on [ERC721](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721) standard. The publisher can use Marketplace or client libraries to deploy a new data NFT contract. To save gas fees, it uses [ERC1167](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1167) proxy approach on the **ERC721 template**. Publisher can then assign manager role to other Ethereum addresses who can deploy new datatoken contracts and even mint them. Each datatoken contract is associated with one data NFT contract. Click [here](datanft-and-datatoken.md) to further read about data NFTs and datatokens.
ERC721 data NFTs represent holding copyright/base IP of a data asset, and ERC20 datatokens represent licenses to access the asset by downloading the content or running Compute-to-Data jobs.
Datatoken represents the asset that the publisher wants to monetize. The asset can be a dataset or an algorithm. The publisher actor holds the asset in Google Drive, Dropbox, AWS S3, on their phone, on their home server, etc. The publisher can optionally use IPFS for a content-addressable URL. Or instead of a file, the publisher may run a compute-to-data service.
In the **publish** step, the publisher invokes **Ocean Datatoken Factory** to deploy a new datatoken to the chain. To save gas fees, it uses [ERC1167](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1167) proxy approach on the **ERC20 datatoken template**. The publisher then mints datatokens.
The publisher runs their own **Ocean Provider** or can use one deployed by Ocean Protocol. In the **download** step or while running C2D job, Provider software needs to retrieve the data service URL given a datatoken address. One approach would be for the publisher to run a database. However, this adds another dependency. To avoid this, the Provider encrypts the URL, which then gets published on-chain.
To initiate the **download** step, the data buyer sends 1.0 datatokens to the Provider wallet. Then they make a service request to the Provider. The Provider loads the encrypted URL, decrypts it, and provisions the requested service (send static data, or enable a compute-to-data job).
Instead of running a Provider themselves, the publisher can have a 3rd party like Ocean Market to run it. While more convenient, it means that the 3rd party has custody of the private encryption/decryption key (more centralized). Ocean will support more service types and URL custody options in the future.
**Ocean JavaScript and Python libraries** act as drivers for the lower-level contracts. Each library integrates with Ocean Provider to provision & access data services, and Ocean Aquarius for metadata.

2
developers/contracts/data-nfts.md
View File

@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ With data NFTs, you are able to take advantage of the broader NFT ecosystem and
We have implemented data NFTs using the [ERC721 standard](https://erc721.org/). Ocean Protocol defines the [ERC721Factory](https://github.com/oceanprotocol/contracts/blob/v4main/contracts/ERC721Factory.sol) contract, allowing **Base IP holders** to create their ERC721 contract instances on any supported networks. The deployed contract stores Metadata, ownership, sub-license information, and permissions. The contract creator can also create and mint ERC20 token instances for sub-licensing the **Base IP**.
ERC721 tokens are non-fungible, and thus cannot be used for automatic price discovery like ERC20 tokens. ERC721 and ERC20 combined together can be used for sub-licensing. Ocean Protocol's [ERC721Template](https://github.com/oceanprotocol/contracts/blob/v4main/contracts/templates/ERC721Template.sol) solves this problem by using ERC721 for tokenizing the **Base IP** and tokenizing sub-licenses by using ERC20.
ERC721 tokens are non-fungible, and thus cannot be used for automatic price discovery like ERC20 tokens. ERC721 and ERC20 combined together can be used for sub-licensing. Ocean Protocol's [ERC721Template](https://github.com/oceanprotocol/contracts/blob/v4main/contracts/templates/ERC721Template.sol) solves this problem by using ERC721 for tokenizing the **Base IP** and tokenizing sub-licenses by using ERC20. To save gas fees, it uses [ERC1167](https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-1167) proxy approach on the **ERC721 template**.
Our implementation has been built on top of the battle-tested [OpenZeppelin contract library](https://docs.openzeppelin.com/contracts/4.x/erc721). However, there are a bunch of interesting parts of our implementation that go a bit beyond an out-of-the-box NFT.