We are working on migrating the extension to a unified network
controller, but before we do so we want to extract some of the existing
pieces, specifically `createInfuraClient` and `createJsonRpcClient`,
which provide the majority of the behavior exhibited within the provider
API that the existing NetworkController exposes. This necessitates that
we understand and test that behavior as a whole.
With that in mind, this commit starts with the Infura-specific network
client and adds some initial functional tests for `createInfuraClient`,
specifically covering three pieces of middleware provided by
`eth-json-rpc-middleware`: `createNetworkAndChainIdMiddleware`,
`createBlockCacheMiddleware`, and `createBlockRefMiddleware`.
These tests exercise logic that originate from multiple different places
and combine in sometimes surprising ways, and as a result, understanding
the nature of the tests can be tricky. I've tried to explain the logic
(both of the implementation and the tests) via comments. Additionally,
debugging why a certain test is failing is not the most fun thing in the
world, so to aid with this, I've added some logging to the underlying
packages used when a request passes through the middleware stack.
Because some middleware change the request being made, or make new
requests altogether, this greatly helps to peel back the curtain, as
failures from Nock do not supply much meaningful information on their
own. This logging is disabled by default, but can be activated by
setting `DEBUG=metamask:*,eth-query DEBUG_COLORS=1` alongside the `jest`
command.
We use this logging by bumping `eth-block-tracker`, and
`eth-json-rpc-middleware`.
The portfolio URL added in #15407 was meant to be configurable via
environment variable or the `.metamaskrc` file, but that configuration
was broken. Instead the default value was always used.
That configuration has been fixed. The portfolio URL can be set either
by environment variable or configuration file.
* Update `eth-json-rpc-infura`
The package `eth-json-rpc-infura@5` has been updated to
`@metamask/eth-json-rpc-infura@7`. This update includes TypeScript
support, and it drops support for older node.js versions. The exports
have also been changed from default to named exports.
See here for a full list of changes: https://github.com/MetaMask/eth-json-rpc-infura/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#700
* Fix LavaMoat policy issue
The `web3` package used by `@metamask/controllers` unintentionally
overwrites the `XMLHttpRequest` global, which breaks things. This was
fixed by revoking `web3`'s write access to that global using a policy
override.
Previously this policy override was applied to `web3`, but for some
unknown reason, this update caused that override to no longer apply.
Resolve an inconsistency between Chrome and Firefox with how the
contentscript runs in an iframe.
This should have no user-facing impact, it's just meant as a safeguard
in case something unintentionally gets included in the contentscript.
* using the aggregators from tokenList instead of detectedToken to avoid conflicts between static and dynamic list
* removing aggregator from the detectTokens object List
* using the aggregators from tokenList instead of detectedToken to avoid conflicts between static and dynamic list
* removing aggregator from the detectTokens object List
* Show 3box deprecation message in whats new
Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <akintayo.segun@gmail.com>
* Add . after message
Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <akintayo.segun@gmail.com>
* Change deprecation notification message and remove date
Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <akintayo.segun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <akintayo.segun@gmail.com>
* Show 3box deprecation message in whats new
Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <akintayo.segun@gmail.com>
* Add . after message
Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <akintayo.segun@gmail.com>
* Change deprecation notification message and remove date
Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <akintayo.segun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Akintayo A. Olusegun <akintayo.segun@gmail.com>
Resolve an inconsistency between Chrome and Firefox with how the
contentscript runs in an iframe.
This should have no user-facing impact, it's just meant as a safeguard
in case something unintentionally gets included in the contentscript.
